Three-Day
Lesson
1.SWBAT
evaluate the qualities of a good leader and synthesize qualities as they
create a campaign presentation.
2.SWBAT
work cooperatively in a group to complete an assignment.
MICHIGAN
ELA CONTENT STANDARDS:
5.1
5.3
MICHIGAN
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS:
2.3
2.4
3.2
TECHNOLOGY
INTEGRATION:
PowerPoint
and laptops.
Journal
writing:What makes a good leader?What qualities do you look for in a leader?
PROCEDURE:
1.Volunteers
share answers to quick-write.Focus questions:Is a good leader compassionate,
strong, charismatic, attractive, intelligent, “one of us,” etc.Does he
have a special ability to lead?
2.Working
in groups of four, students decide whom they would choose for leader (Jack
or Ralph) based on what they have read in Lord of the Flies thus far.Once
the group has decided, they then create a campaign presentation in PowerPoint
for their candidate.Each member of the group must create 2 slides, one
slide stating an important quality of a leader and why it is important,
and one slide citing examples from the text of their candidate exhibiting
that leadership quality.In addition, each group must choose one member
to fill the role of data entry person.The data entry person from each group
will be responsible for creating a title slide and an introductory slide.This
person will also help group members who are not as familiar with using
Power Point.
3.Begin
creating campaign presentations in PowerPoint.All individuals give their
two slides (written on paper) to data entry person.I will check for this.
4.Remind
students to have list of each member’s name and leadership quality chosen
to hand me before presenting the campaign the day after tomorrow.
5.Students
continue to create campaign in PowerPoint on second day of the lesson.The
class has 9 computers to work on and 7 groups of 4 students, so students
must take turns.This explains the need for a data entry person.
6.On
the third day, students present their campaigns.Each group has 5 minutes
to present while the other students must take notes on what they liked
and what they thought could be improved with each presentation.
I
evaluated this exercise based on 50% content and 50% presentation and visuals.The
content of most was good, although some had more difficulty applying the
text to their heroic quality.Visually, I was able to assess that I needed
to talk about cohesiveness in a group presentation and the use of clear,
readable graphics.Some of the fonts chosen were difficult to read or the
type was too light on the background they used.Another problem was the
discrepancy between the backgrounds of the slides used.Within one group,
each member used a different layout and background for the slide.This made
the presentation harder to follow than the groups whose consistent layout
allowed for a smooth transition between slides.